<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Before the Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2009/06/18/before-the-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2009/06/18/before-the-law/</link>
	<description>Blogging on Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet There Is Method In It &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Myth of Sisyphus</title>
		<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2009/06/18/before-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet There Is Method In It &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Myth of Sisyphus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/?p=665#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] Meaning the metaphysical world is inhuman. But the metaphysical world cannot be known except by excepting (tacitly or otherwise) the testimony of our senses. So where does the expectation that the world should be &#8220;reasonable&#8221; originate? In our nostalgia i.e. ourselves? But with the rejection of metaphysics, we reject the a-priori idea of reasonableness of the world. Of course, Camus does not claim that people generally share his view. He spends effort distancing himself from Kierkegaard when I perhaps would have been interested in a constrast with Nietzsche (surprise surprise!) The appendix discusses Kafka&#8217;s work and interestingly rejects it as absurdist. The possibility of K reaching The Castle is, according to Camus, retained. I don&#8217;t see the stark contrast he draws between that and The Trial. The protagonist tenaciously seeks access to The Castle or acquittal from The Trial. Both are predicted by other characters to be impossible. And even if he does access the Castle, which is never described since the author abandoned the work, he probably would find another layer of bureaucracy and another and another &#8211; in the same fashion as Kafka&#8217;s parable Before The Law. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meaning the metaphysical world is inhuman. But the metaphysical world cannot be known except by excepting (tacitly or otherwise) the testimony of our senses. So where does the expectation that the world should be &#8220;reasonable&#8221; originate? In our nostalgia i.e. ourselves? But with the rejection of metaphysics, we reject the a-priori idea of reasonableness of the world. Of course, Camus does not claim that people generally share his view. He spends effort distancing himself from Kierkegaard when I perhaps would have been interested in a constrast with Nietzsche (surprise surprise!) The appendix discusses Kafka&#8217;s work and interestingly rejects it as absurdist. The possibility of K reaching The Castle is, according to Camus, retained. I don&#8217;t see the stark contrast he draws between that and The Trial. The protagonist tenaciously seeks access to The Castle or acquittal from The Trial. Both are predicted by other characters to be impossible. And even if he does access the Castle, which is never described since the author abandoned the work, he probably would find another layer of bureaucracy and another and another &#8211; in the same fashion as Kafka&#8217;s parable Before The Law. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti Citizen One</title>
		<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2009/06/18/before-the-law/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Citizen One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/?p=665#comment-849</guid>
		<description>As the group &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkuOAY-S6OY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rage Against the Machine once said&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
And now you do what they told ya
But now you do what they told ya
Well now you do what they told ya&lt;/blockquote&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the group <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkuOAY-S6OY" rel="nofollow">Rage Against the Machine once said</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
And now you do what they told ya<br />
But now you do what they told ya<br />
Well now you do what they told ya</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

