<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wittgenstein and the Mystical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/</link>
	<description>Blogging on Philosophy and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:59:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Sordo</title>
		<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>El Sordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>A better aphorism (although repeating one of the above) consider the deed before the word.
The word cannot meaningfully exist independentally of the deed or the fact or the picture idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better aphorism (although repeating one of the above) consider the deed before the word.<br />
The word cannot meaningfully exist independentally of the deed or the fact or the picture idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Sordo</title>
		<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>El Sordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>You are free to meditate on this matter for as long as you want. For religion is always an existential/experiential dare I even suggest empirical phenomenon. We can potentially agree on religions positive points if we reject metaphysics. Which is what analytical philosophy (particularly Wittgenstein is all about).
The maxim I would propose is:
All metaphysics purpoting to be rational or sensible truth is nonsense.
In other words all metaphysics is non-rational and non-sensical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are free to meditate on this matter for as long as you want. For religion is always an existential/experiential dare I even suggest empirical phenomenon. We can potentially agree on religions positive points if we reject metaphysics. Which is what analytical philosophy (particularly Wittgenstein is all about).<br />
The maxim I would propose is:<br />
All metaphysics purpoting to be rational or sensible truth is nonsense.<br />
In other words all metaphysics is non-rational and non-sensical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti Citizen One</title>
		<link>http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Citizen One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 20:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.methodinit.org.uk/methodinit/2007/06/11/wittgenstein-and-the-mystical/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>I will have to think about this. My mind is slightly boggled by religion being separate from metaphysics! (Is occurrence is not necessarily bad.)

AC1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will have to think about this. My mind is slightly boggled by religion being separate from metaphysics! (Is occurrence is not necessarily bad.)</p>
<p>AC1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
