A post script follow on (which I was of two minds if to post at all):

“In our contact with Iban society, we should observe the phenomena and accept the phenomena for what it is, a function of Iban society.” If we followed this, we could not really debate anything because everything is “just language games” and we “exist on different planes”. Aren’t you trying to advance the transpersonal paradigm to me, a Naturalist? By Wittgenstein’s point is this disallowed? (This is a stab at reduction to the absurd.)

Anti Citizen One